首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

Logistic回归在建立产前筛查唐氏综合征风险估计模型中的应用
引用本文:卓仁杰 李,莺 张莉娜 沈其君.Logistic回归在建立产前筛查唐氏综合征风险估计模型中的应用[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2016,0(2):108-111.
作者姓名:卓仁杰 李  莺 张莉娜 沈其君
作者单位:1.宁波大学 医学院, 浙江 宁波 315211; 2.宁波市第一医院 内科, 浙江 宁波 315000
摘    要:利用64772例12~20周筛查孕妇(正常孕妇64718例, 唐氏患者54例)的孕妇血清学指标, 采用Logistic回归, 建立三联筛查方案和二联筛查方案的风险估计模型. 采用2种方案, 计算全部筛查孕妇的风险值, 通过ROC曲线下面积、检出率、阳性率评价2种筛查方案的效果. 结果表明: 年龄、甲胎蛋白、游离人绒毛膜促性腺激素和游离雌三醇在Logistic回归模型中均有统计学意义, 三联方案ROC曲线下面积大于二联方案, 但无显著性差异(z统计量为1.382, P=0.1669); 在同一截断值下, 三联方案检出率高于二联方案, 假阳性率低于二联方案, 差异有统计学意义(t=-9.44, P<0.001). 三联方案根据约登指数计算, 最佳筛查截断值为1:400, 假阳性率为4.3%.

关 键 词:风险估计模型  Logistic回归  孕中期  唐氏综合征  筛查方案

Predicting Risk of Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome Using Logistic Regression Model
ZHUO Ren-jie,LI Ying,ZHANG Li-na,SHEN Qi-jun.Predicting Risk of Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome Using Logistic Regression Model[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science and Engineering Edition),2016,0(2):108-111.
Authors:ZHUO Ren-jie  LI Ying  ZHANG Li-na  SHEN Qi-jun
Institution:1.School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China; 2.Internal Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China
Abstract:In this study, a total of 64772 pregnant weman in gestational timeframe between 12 to 20 weeks are selected for analytical purposes, including 64718 normal pregnant weman and 54 suffering Down’s syndrome. The maternal serum markers are converted to serum with multiple of median (MoM) adjusted by grouping the gestational age and weight. The MoM is adjusted by twin, smoking and diabetes in the Logistic regression model. Risk estimation is calculated for each pregnant woman using two different screening methods. Area under the curve of receiver operator characteristic (AUC), detection rate and false positive rate are calculated individually to assess the effect of these two different methods. Results show that age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), free human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and unconjugated estriol (uE3) are significantly dominant in the Logistic regression model. The AUC of tripe serum screening is larger than that of double serum screening, but manifests no significant difference (z=1.382, P=0.166 9). With the same cutoff value, the detection rate of triple serum screening is higher than that of double serum screening, and the false positive rate of triple serum screening is lower than that of double serum screening. The significant difference is detected between these two different models (t=-9.44, P<0.001). Triple serum screening is found to be the superior todouble serum screening compared with other screenings. Also noted is that when the false positive rate is 4.3%, the optimal cutoff value turns out to be 1:400.
Keywords:risk assessment model  Logistic regression  second trimester  Down’s syndrome  screening
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(理工版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(理工版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号