Protonated acetylene revisited

The potential energy surface for protonated acetylene has been re-examined with large basis sets and highly correlated methods. The energy difference of 3.6–3.8 kcal/mol between the classical structure and non-classical (bridged) structure computed with CCSD (T)/cc-pVQZ, CCSD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2pd), BD(T)/cc- pVQZ, BD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2pd) and CBS-APNO methods is in very good agreement with the best previous calculations, 3.7–4.0 kcal/mol. In contrast, BLYP, B3LYP, PW91, PBE and TPSS density functional methods do rather poorly, yielding −0.52. 0.29, 1.81, 2.16 and 0.62 kcal/mol, respectively, with the 6-311+G(3df,2pd) basis. MP2 calculations predict the classical structure to be a transition state; however, frequency calculations at the CCSD/6-311+G(3df,2pd) level of theory show that the classical structure is a local minimum. CCSD(T), BD(T) and CBS-APNO energy calculations along the MP2/6-311+G(3df,2pd) reaction path indicate that the classical structure is a shallow local minimum separated from the non-classical structure by a very small barrier of 0.11–0.13 kcal/mol. Because the barrier for proton exchange between the non-classical isomers via the classical structure is broad and nearly flat at the top, the tunneling splitting should be reduced, possibly accounting for the 15% difference between the calculated and experimental barrier heights. Contribution to the Fernando Bernardi Memorial Issue.