Metal Derivatives of Thiosemicarbazones: Crystal and Mole­cular Structures of Mono‐ and Dinuclear Copper(II) Complexes with N1‐Subsitituted Salicylaldehyde Thiosemicarbazones

Reactions of copper(II) acetate with N¹‐subsitituted salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazones R¹R²C²=N³–N²H–C¹(=S)–N¹HR³;R¹ = 2‐HO–C₆H₄–, R² = H : R³ = Me (H₂L¹), Et (H₂L²)] are described. Copper(II) acetate was reacted with H₂L¹ and H₂L² ligands in the presence of polypyridyl co‐ligands, and this led to the formation ofmononuclear complexes, Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L¹)(κ²‐N, N‐bipy)] ( 1 ),Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L)(κ²‐N, N‐phen)] L = L¹ ( 3 ), L² ( 4 )], Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L)(κ²‐N, N‐tmphen)] L =L¹ ( 5 ), L² ( 6 )] and a dinuclear complex, Cu₂L²₂(bipy)] ( 2 ) (bipy = 2, 2′‐bipyridine, phen = 1, 10‐phenanthroline, tmphen = 3, 4, 7, 8‐tetramethyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline). In dinuclear complex 2 , one ligand is O, N³,S‐chelating, while second is O, N³,S‐chelation‐cum‐N²‐bridging; and in all others thio‐ligands are O, N³,S‐chelating. The μ_eff values for the complexes lie in the range of 1.79–1.83 BM. Complexes 1 , 3 – 6 have square pyramidal arrangement, whereas complex 2 has two independent molecules in the crystal lattice, and each molecule has trigonal bipyramidal square planar (5:4) coordination pair. Complexes 2 , 4 , and 6 showed fluorescence properties.