首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of three post-column reaction methods for the analysis of bromate and nitrite in drinking water
Authors:Shinya Echigo  Roger A Minear  Harumi Yamada  Peter E Jackson
Institution:

a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1101 W. Peabody Drive, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

b Research Center for Environmental Quality Control, Kyoto University, Otsu 520-0811, Japan

c Dionex Corp., 1228 Titan Way, Sunnyvale, CA 94088-3603, USA

Abstract:Three post-column ion chromatographic methods (i.e., a sodium bromide–sodium nitrite method, an o-dianisidine method, and a potassium iodide–ammonium heptamolybdate method) were compared for bromate and nitrite analysis. Also, the effect of direct mixing of the reagents without ion suppressors for the sodium bromide–sodium nitrite method and the potassium iodide–ammonium heptamolybdate method was investigated. For the analysis of bromate, the three methods showed similar method detection limits (0.17–0.24 μg/l) with pneumatic reagent delivery systems. Direct reagent mixing achieved comparable detection limits to the suppressor configuration. The three methods are also compatible with conductivity detection. When used in combination with conductivity detection, this compatibility allows simultaneous analysis of bromate, nitrite, and other common ions in drinking water, such as bromide. It was found that the o-dianisidine method achieves μg/l-level detection of nitrite and bromate with a simpler configuration than the potassium iodide–ammonium heptamolybdate method, while the sodium bromide–sodium nitrite method was not sufficiently sensitive for nitrite analysis at the μg/l level.
Keywords:Bromate  Nitrite  Inorganic anions
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号