Analytical performance is improved by regular participation in proficiency testing: an analysis of data from the Aquacheck proficiency testing scheme

Analysis of historical data from the Aquacheck proficiency testing scheme demonstrates improvement in the performance of participants correlated to the frequency of participation. Analysis of the spread of results returned by all participants, defined by the percentage relative standard deviation (RSD) and the performance (Z) scores awarded to the individual participants, indicates that the overall performance for the group of participants is consistent. However, when the frequency of participation is analysed, it can be clearly seen that those laboratories who participated in the majority of the distributions available reported 10–15% more acceptable (Z-scores between +2 and ?2) results than those labs who took part with a greatly reduced frequency. When ‘more difficult’ analytes are considered, those laboratories who participated in greater than 75% of available rounds reported up to 30% more acceptable results than those laboratories who participated in 25% or fewer, of the available rounds.