首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

旋流燃烧NO生成的USM湍流反应模型
引用本文:王方,周力行,张健. 旋流燃烧NO生成的USM湍流反应模型[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2003, 24(4): 691-694
作者姓名:王方  周力行  张健
作者单位:清华大学力学系,煤的清洁燃烧国家重点实验室,北京,100084
基金项目:国家重点基础研究专项经费资助项目(No.G1999-0222-07)
摘    要:用统一二阶矩(USM)湍流反应模型对不同旋流数下甲烷-空气旋流燃烧NO生成进行了数值模拟,并和EBU-Arrhenius(E-A)燃烧模型对燃烧的模拟结果和简化PDF湍流反应模型对NO生成的模拟结果以及相应的实验结果进行对比。结果表明,USM模型显著地优于E-A模型和简化PDF模型。E-A模型不能合理地模拟有限反应动力学,而简化PDF模型用两个单变量PDF的乘积代替联合PDF,大大地低估了NO湍流反应率。USM模型预报结果和实验结果符合最好。

关 键 词:NO生成  湍流旋流燃烧  二阶矩模型
文章编号:0253-231X(2003)04-0691-04
修稿时间:2002-10-22

A UNIFIED SECOND-ORDER MOMENT TURBULENCE-CHEMISTRY MODEL OF NO FORMATION IN SWIRLING COMBUSTION
WANG Fang ZHOU Li-Xing ZHANG Jian. A UNIFIED SECOND-ORDER MOMENT TURBULENCE-CHEMISTRY MODEL OF NO FORMATION IN SWIRLING COMBUSTION[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2003, 24(4): 691-694
Authors:WANG Fang ZHOU Li-Xing ZHANG Jian
Abstract:A unified second-order moment (USM) turbulence-chemistry model is used to simulate NO formation in methane-air swirling combustion for different swirl numbers, and the simulation results are compared with those using the EBU-Arrhenius (E-A) combustion model and the simplified PDF turbulent reaction model of NO formation and the corresponding measurement results. The results indicate that the USM model is obviously better than the E-A model and the simplified PDF model. The E-A model cannot reasonably simulate the finite-rate kinetics, while the simplified PDF model, using a product of two single-variable PDF's instead of a joint PDF, seriously under-predicts the NO reaction rate. The USM model gives the best agreement with the experimental results.
Keywords:NO formation  turbulent swirling combustion  second-order moment model
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号