首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Mass spectral studies towards more reliable measurement of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid and other perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) in food matrices using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry
Authors:Antony S Lloyd  Victoria A Bailey  Simon J Hird  Anne Routledge  Don B Clarke
Institution:1. The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK;2. Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Abstract:Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) experiments are described, leading to a reliable method for the measurement of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and other perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) in foods. Separations were performed on new fluorinated stationary phases, RP Octyl (‐C8F17) or propyl‐perfluorobenzene (‐C3H6‐C6F5), to ensure resolution of PFOS and interfering taurohydroxycholate isomers. Aqueous ammonium formate (5 mM) and methanol were used as the mobile phases. The mass spectrometer was operated in negative electrospray ionisation mode, recording two transitions for each analyte and one for each internal standard. The purities of the analytical standards for the eleven target perfluoro analytes (C7 to C12 carboxylic acids, C4, C6 and C8 sulfonic acids, and octanesulfonamide (PFOSA)) were found to be in close agreement with the supplied values; the lowest purity was 91%. Five candidate internal standards were investigated, 13C4‐PFOS, 13C4‐perfluorooctanoic acid, 13C2‐perfluorodecanoic acid, D9n‐ethylperfluorooctanesulfonamidoethanol (D9n‐Et‐FOSE) and D3n‐methylperfluorooctanesulfonamide (D3n‐Me‐FOSA); the purities were all >98%. The use of tetrahydro‐PFOS generated backgrounds (>1 µg/kg) for perfluoroheptanoic acid and perfluorobutanesulfonic acid. Similarly D9n‐Et‐FOSE was unacceptable and D3n‐Me‐FOSA was volatile, leaving no clear candidate for normalisation of the measurement of PFOSA. Severe matrix‐induced suppression and enhancement effects influenced ionisation, making external calibration and quantification problematic. This was addressed by a parallel standard addition and matrix‐matching approach, comparing ionisation in methanol, in procedural blanks and in food‐based extracts. The limits of detection (LODs) of 0.001–0.01 µg/kg in solvent and 0.01–1 µg/kg in foods demonstrate that this method is suitable for the determination of PFCs in all food to the required 1 µg/kg reporting level. © Crown copyright 2009. Reproduced with the permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号