Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: rate normalization and nonspeech perception

In a variety of experiments and paradigms, researchers have attempted to determine whether or not speech perception is specialized by comparing perception of speech syllables to perception of nonspeech analogs. While nonspeech analogs appear optimal as comparisons to speech because they are acoustically similar without being recognized as speechlike, it is argued that the comparison they offer is confounded and uninterpretable. Two experiments are designed to show that, in auditory perception generally where acoustic signals are causal consequences of mechanical events, perceptual experiences are of the mechanical events themselves, not of the acoustic signal. This has two consequences. One is that there is a confounding in comparisons of speech with sine wave analogs that, whereas the one perceived as speech also has a definite causal source, the other, perceived as nonspeech, has an indeterminate or ambiguous source. A second is that response patterns in classification tasks such as those used in the literature comparing speech to nonspeech will reflect properties of the perceived sound-producing event; they will not provide a clear window on auditory system processes used to recover event properties. Experiment 3 is designed to show that perception of many acoustic-signal-producing events can appear to be special by the logic of speech-sine wave comparisons--even events that cannot plausibly be supposed to involve a specialization.