首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Finite element calculation of viscoelastic flow in a journal bearing: II. Moderate eccentricity
Affiliation:1. Surgical unit, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland;2. Trauma Unit, HUH Musculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, P.O. Box 266, 00029 HUS, Finland;3. Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;1. Associate Professor of Psychology and OB/GYN, Director of Clinical Training (Clinical Psychology PhD program), Co-Director, Mother Baby Connections, Drexel University, Visiting Professor of Neonatology, Children''s Hospital of Philadelphia USA;2. Drexel University USA;3. Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology in Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment and Garbose Family Special Delivery Unit, Children''s Hospital of Philadelphia USA;4. Children''s Hospital of Philadelphia USA;5. Director of Psychosocial Services, Division of Neonatology, The Children''s Hospital of Philadelphia, Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania USA
Abstract:Finite element calculations of two-dimensional flows of viscoelastic fluids in a journal bearing geometry reported in an earlier paper (J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech. 16 (1984) 141-172) are extended to higher eccentricity (ρ = 0.4); at this higher eccentricity flow separation occurs in the wide part of the gap for a Newtonian fluid. Calculations for the second-order fluid (SOF), upper-convected Maxwell (UCM), and the Giesekus models are continued in increasing Deborah number for each model until either a limit point is reached or oscillations in the solution make the numerical accuracy too poor to warrant proceeding. No steady solutions to the UCM model were found beyond a limit point Dec, as was the case for results at low eccentricities. The value of Dec was moderately stabel to mesh refinement. A limit point also terminated the calculations with a SOF model, in contradiction to the theorems for uniqueness and existence for this model. The critical value of De increased drastically with increasing refinement of the mesh, as expected for solution pathology caused by approximation error. Calculations for the Giesekus fluid with the mobility parameter α ≠ O showed no limit points, but failed when irregular oscillations destroyed the quality of the solution. The behavior of the recirculation region of the flow and the load on the inner cylinder were very sensitive to the value of α used in the Giesekus model. The recirculation disappeared at low values of De except when the mobility parameter α was so small that the viscosity was almost constant over the range of shear rates in the calculations. The recirculation persisted over the entire range of accessible De for the UCM fluid, the limit of α = O of the Giesekus model. The behavior of the recirculation is coupled directly to the viscosity by calculations with an inelastic fluid with the same viscosity predicted by the Giesekus model.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号