A lower bound on the number of iterations of long-step primal-dual linear programming algorithms

Recently, Todd has analyzed in detail the primal-dual affine-scaling method for linear programming, which is close to what is implemented in practice, and proved that it may take at leastn ^1/3 iterations to improve the initial duality gap by a constant factor. He also showed that this lower bound holds for some polynomial variants of primal-dual interior-point methods, which restrict all iterates to certain neighborhoods of the central path. In this paper, we further extend his result to long-step primal-dual variants that restrict the iterates to a wider neighborhood. This neigh-borhood seems the least restrictive one to guarantee polynomiality for primal-dual path-following methods, and the variants are also even closer to what is implemented in practice.Research supported in part by NSF, AFOSR and ONR through NSF Grant DMS-8920550.This author is supported in part by NSF Grant DDM-9207347. Part of thiw work was done while the author was on a sabbatical leave from the University of Iowa and visiting the Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, supported in part by the Cornell Center for Applied Mathematics and by the Advanced Computing Research Institute, a unit of the Cornell Theory Center, which receives major funding from the National Science Foundation and IBM Corporation, with additional support from New York State and members of its Corporate Research Institute.