Aromaticity Effects on the Profiles of the Lowest Triplet‐State Potential‐Energy Surfaces for Rotation about the CC Bonds of Olefins with Five‐Membered Ring Substituents: An Example of the Impact of Baird’s Rule

A density functional theory study on olefins with five‐membered monocyclic 4n and 4n+2 π‐electron substituents (C₄H₃X; X=CH⁺, SiH⁺, BH, AlH, CH₂, SiH₂, O, S, NH, and CH^?) was performed to assess the connection between the degree of substituent (anti)aromaticity and the profile of the lowest triplet‐state (T₁) potential‐energy surface (PES) for twisting about olefinic C?C bonds. It exploited both Hückel’s rule on aromaticity in the closed‐shell singlet ground state (S₀) and Baird’s rule on aromaticity in the lowest ππ* excited triplet state. The compounds CH₂?CH(C₄H₃X) were categorized as set A and set B olefins depending on which carbon atom (C2 or C3) of the C₄H₃X ring is bonded to the olefin. The degree of substituent (anti)aromaticity goes from strongly S₀‐antiaromatic/T₁‐aromatic (C₅H₄⁺) to strongly S₀‐aromatic/T₁‐ antiaromatic (C₅H₄^?). Our hypothesis is that the shapes of the T₁ PESs, as given by the energy differences between planar and perpendicularly twisted olefin structures in T₁ ΔE(T₁)], smoothly follow the changes in substituent (anti)aromaticity. Indeed, correlations between ΔE(T₁) and the (anti)aromaticity changes of the C₄H₃X groups, as measured by the zz‐tensor component of the nucleus‐independent chemical shift ΔNICS(T₁;1)_zz, are found both for sets A and B separately (linear fits; r²=0.949 and 0.851, respectively) and for the two sets combined (linear fit; r²=0.851). For sets A and B combined, strong correlations are also found between ΔE(T₁) and the degree of S₀ (anti)aromaticity as determined by NICS(S₀,1)_zz (sigmoidal fit; r²=0.963), as well as between the T₁ energies of the planar olefins and NICS(S₀,1)_zz (linear fit; r²=0.939). Thus, careful tuning of substituent (anti)aromaticity allows for design of small olefins with T₁ PESs suitable for adiabatic Z/E photoisomerization.