Measurement of total protein in urine: Comparison of two dye-binding procedures with a gel filtration/modified biuret method

Two dye-binding methods for the determination of urinary total protein concentration have been compared to a biuret-based procedure requiring a preliminary gel filtration step. The biuret-based procedure is claimed to be both specific and sensitive for the measurement of protein in urine. With those urines having relatively low protein concentrations, the dye-binding methods provide values about one-half of those given by the modified biuret procedure. This difference disappears when urines containing high levels of protein are measured. The lower results obtained at normal protein levels are most likely caused by the inability of dye-binding methods to measure proteins of high carbohydrate content (such as uromucoid) accurately. In spite of this limitation, both dye-binding methods appear suitable for routine use. In contrast to the biuret-based procedure, we found the dye-binding methods to be free from interferences by compounds known to appear in urine in high concentrations.