首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Potential sources of background contaminants in solid phase extraction and microextraction
Authors:Stiles Robert  Yang Ill  Lippincott Robert Lee  Murphy Eileen  Buckley Brian
Institution:Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Abstract:A study to identify the sources of background contamination from SPE, using a C-18 sorbent, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), using a 70 microm carbowax/divinylbenzene (CW/DVB) fiber, was carried out. To determine the source of contamination, each material used in the procedure was isolated and examined for their contribution. The solid-phase column components examined were: sorbent material and frits, column housings and each solvent used to elute analytes off the column. The components examined in the SPME procedure were: SPME fiber, SPME vials, water (HPLC grade), and salt (sodium chloride) used to increase the ionic strength. The majority of the background contaminants from SPE were found to be from the SPE sorbent material and frits. The class of contaminants extracted during a blank extraction were phthalates and other plasticizers used during the manufacturing process. All had blank levels corresponding to measured concentrations below 2 ng/ mL, except for undecane, which had a concentration of 5.4 ng/mL. The most prevalent contaminants in the SPME blank procedure are 1,9-nonanediol, a mixture of phthalates and highly bis-substituted phenols. All the concentrations were below 2 ng/mL, with the exception of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, which had concentrations ranging from 5 to 20 ng/mL.
Keywords:Background contamination  Sample preparation  Solid‐phase extraction  Solid‐phase microextraction
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号