Comparative analytical quantitation of clenbuterol in biological matrices using GC-MS and EIA |
| |
Authors: | Abukhalaf I K von Deutsch D A Parks B A Wineski L Paulsen D Aboul-Enein H Y Potter D E |
| |
Institution: | Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA. |
| |
Abstract: | A simple and sensitive procedure utilizing GC-MS for the identification and quantitation of clenbuterol in biofluids and tissues is described. This improved method utilizes trimethylboroxine for the derivatization of clenbuterol, requires only 1 mL/g of biological sample, and most importantly does not require an extra cleaning step for urine specimens prior to extraction. Linear quantitative response curves have been generated for derivatized clenbuterol over a concentration range of 5-200 ng/mL. The extraction efficiency at four representative points of the standard curve exceeded 90% in both specimen types (plasma and urine). Linear regression analyses of the standard curve in both specimen types exhibited correlation coefficients ranging from 0.997 to 1.000. The Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantitation (LOQ) values for plasma specimens were determined to be 0.5 and 1.5 ng/mL respectively. For urine specimens, LOD and LOQ values were 0.2 and 0.7 ng/microL respectively. Percentage recoveries ranged from 91 to 95% for urine and 89 to 101% for plasma. Precision and accuracy (within-run and between-run) studies reflected a high level of reliability and reproducibility of the method. In addition to its reliability, sensitivity and simplicity, this modified procedure is more efficient and cost effective, requiring less time, only 1 mL of sample, and minimal amounts of extraction solvents. The applicability of the method for the detection and quantitation of clenbuterol in biological tissues of rats treated with the drug was demonstrated successfully. For comparative analysis of clenbuterol in plasma and liver samples, both GC-MS and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods are found to be suitable. Due to potential antibody-cross reactivity with EIA, the GC-MS method is the method of choice for most samples because of its specificity. However, the EIA method is considered the method of choice for analysis of clenbuterol found in concentrations below the limits of quantitation by GC-MS due to its sensitivity. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|