首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Apparent diffusion coefficient of line scan diffusion image in normal prostate and prostate cancer—comparison with single-shot echo planner image
Authors:Takeshi Yoshizako  Akihiko WadaKoji Uchida  Shinji HaraMikio Igawa  Hajime KitagakiStephan E. Maier
Affiliation:
  • a Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 00693-8501, 89-1 Enya Izumo, Japan
  • b Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 00693-8501, 89-1 Enya Izumo, Japan
  • c Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women''s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Abstract:

    Purpose

    This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of line scan diffusion images (LSDI) in normal prostate and prostate cancer. Single-shot echo planner images (SS-EPI) were used for comparison.

    Materials and Methods

    Twenty prostate tumors were examined by conventional MRI in 14 patients prior to radical prostatectomy. All patients were examined with a 1.5-T MR imager (Signa CV/i ver. 9.1 GE Medical System Milwaukee, WI, USA). Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) using LSDI was performed with a pelvic phased-array coil, with b values of 5 and 800 s/mm2. DWI using SS-EPI was performed with a body coil, with b values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. The ADCs of each sequence for 14 normal prostate and 20 prostate cancers were histopathologically assessed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on DWI was estimated and compared for each sequence.

    Results

    The mean ADCs (±S.D.) of normal peripheral zones (PZ), transition zones (TZ) and cancer (in 10−3 mm2/s) that used LSDI were 1.42±0.12, 1.23±0.10 and 0.79±0.19, respectively. Those that used SS-EPI were 1.76±0.26, 1.38±0.20 and 1.05±0.27, respectively. Using unpaired t test (P<.05), we found a significant difference in each sequence between normal tissue (both PZ and TZ) and the cancer. Paired t test (P<.05) also registered a significant difference between LSDI and SS-EPI. Mean SNR for DWI using LSDI was 16.49±5.03, while the DWI using SS-EPI was 18.85±9.26. The difference between the SNR of each sequence was not statistically significant by paired t test.

    Conclusion

    We found that ADCs using LSDI and SS-EPI showed similar tendencies in the same patients. However, in all regions, LSDI ADCs had smaller standard deviations than SS-EPI ADCs.
    Keywords:Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging   Apparent diffusion coefficient   Line scan diffusion image   Single-shot echo planner image   Prostate
    本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
    设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

    Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号