Applicability of the free volume concept on relaxation phenomena in the glass transition range

Conclusion Except the discrepancies mentioned with respect to pressure investigations, which need clarification in the future, we can conclude in a general way, as follows.As far as only average parameters of macroscopic samples are considered (complex moduli, or dielectric constants, volume or heat content etc....), the free volume concept can relate the variations of molecular mobility to the changes of an average free volume in a semiquantitative way. This average free volume can no longer fully caracterize the wide variety of molecular motions involved in the kinetics of redistribution of holes in the liquid during the recovery experiments. These kinetic processes involve a wide distribution of retardation times, which may be associated with the local distribution of holes, or with that of cooperating groups of molecules, or molecular segments.On the other hand, free volume is not necessarily the fundamental molecular parameter which controls the rate of configurational changes, characterized by the variation of entropy of the liquid (14). Even if this is the case, most of the above discussion may be applied to any other average excess parameter, as far as theDoolittle equation is formally adopted, in which (f/b) is expressed in terms of the new parameter, rather than that of free volume. However, since the relaxational free volume, as determined from the W.L.F. equation, and the independently measured volume changes are often in close agreement, this means that the variations of the excess entropy (12), or those of the configurational free energy (13), and the changes in volume are closely related. Therefore, the free volume concept remains still a valuable tool for unifying different kinds of rate processes from both a theoretical and an experimental point of view, especially in the glass transition range.