Applicability of medium-size basis sets in calculations of molecular dynamic polarisabilities |
| |
Authors: | Angelika Baranowska-Łączkowska Berta Fernández Antonio Rizzo Filip Pawłowski |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institute of Physics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Polandangelika.baranowska@ukw.edu.pl;3. Center for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials (CIQUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spainhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6686-6534;4. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche – CNR, Istituto per i Processi Chimico Fisici (IPCF-CNR), UOS di Pisa, Area della Ricerca, Pisa, Italy;5. Institute of Physics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland;6. Department of Chemistry, qLEAP Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark |
| |
Abstract: | Static and dynamic average polarisabilities and polarisability anisotropies of seven linear non-polar and polar molecules are calculated within the CCS, CC2, and CC3 approximations using a range of medium-sized basis sets: the polarised LPol-n (n = ds, dl, fs, fl), the aug-pc-n (n = 1, 2), the def2-SVPD, and -TZVPD basis sets. Reference values are obtained using a hierarchy of Dunning's (d-)aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q, 5) basis sets. The results are discussed together with the available CCSD values in terms of basis set and correlation method errors, and their ratio. Detailed analysis shows that already the def2-SVPD basis set can be used in CCS polarisability calculations. When affordable, the slightly larger aug-pc-1 basis set is recommended, as it leads to significant reduction of basis set error. The def2-TZVPD, LPol-ds, and aug-pc-2 basis sets are optimal choice within the CC2 approximation, with the latter allowing to approach the CC2 basis set limit. The LPol-ds, -dl, and def2-TZVPD sets outperform the aug-cc-pVTZ set in average polarisability CCSD calculations, with the def2-TZVPD being competitive to other reduced-size sets also in determination of polarisability anisotropy. The aug-pc-2 basis is a particularly attractive choice for CCSD, giving the accuracy of aug-cc-pVQZ at a significantly reduced computational cost. The polarisability anisotropy is shown to be more computationally demanding than the average polarisability, in particular with respect to the accuracy of the correlation method and an accurate evaluation of this property requires at least the CCSD model. |
| |
Keywords: | property-oriented basis set electric dipole polarisability CCS, CC2, CCSD and CC3 model reduction of computational cost non-interacting molecules |
|
|