首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


How to play the Majority game with a liar
Authors:Steve Butler  Jia Mao
Affiliation:a Department of Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA
b Department of Computer Science and Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0404, USA
Abstract:The Majority game is played by a questioner (View the MathML source) and an answerer (View the MathML source). View the MathML source holds n elements, each of which can be labeled as 0 or 1. View the MathML source is trying to identify some element View the MathML source holds as having the Majority label or, in the case of a tie, claim there is none. To do this View the MathML source asks questions comparing whether two elements have the same or different label. View the MathML source’s goal is to ask as few questions as possible while View the MathML source’s goal is to delay View the MathML source as much as possible. Let q denote the minimal number of questions needed for View the MathML source to identify a Majority element regardless of View the MathML source’s answers.In this paper we investigate upper and lower bounds for q in a variation of the Majority game, where View the MathML source is allowed to lie up to t times. We consider two versions of the game, the adaptive (where questions are asked sequentially) and the oblivious (where questions are asked in one batch).
Keywords:Majority game   Liar games   Adaptive   Oblivious
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号