The Evolution of High-Throughput Macromolecular Crystallography at Synchrotrons

On May 11 and 12, 2000, the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, as it was then known, hosted a “Workshop on Techniques for Automated Mounting, Viewing and Centering Pre-Cooled Protein Crystals” [1 http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/conferences/workshops/px-robotics/. [Google Scholar], 2 E. Abola, Nature Structural Biology 7, 973–977 (2000).[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]]. The 12 presentations during the meeting all focused on the impact that automation could have on the performance of synchrotron beamlines and thus on research in structural biology. Two principal themes ran through the workshop: (1) robotics to mount crystals on a diffractometer; and (2) methods to place a crystal in the X-ray beam. Five conceptual and prototype robotic systems for automated mounting were described—the original ACTOR from Abbott Laboratories, later modified and marketed by Rigaku/MSC, and the systems which in final form become the ALS [3 G. Snell, Structure 12, 537–545 (2004).[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]], EMBL/ESRF SC3 [4 F. Cipriani, Acta Cryst. D62(10), 1251–1259 (2006). [Google Scholar]], APS/SBC [5 D. Shu, AIP Conference Proceedings 705(1), 1201–1204 (2004).[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]], and SSRL SAM robots [6 A. E. Cohen, J. Appl. Cryst. 5(6), 720–726 (2002).[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. By December of that year, the ACTOR had been installed for testing at Sector 32 of the Advanced Photon Source (Figure 1). Within three years, by the end of 2003, several of these robots, plus the commercial MARcsc from MAR Research, had been deployed to handle frozen protein crystals at beamlines for macromolecular crystallography (MX). Currently, at least 13 distinct robot types, not including variants of the ALS automounter, are employed at synchrotron beamlines to transfer crystals from storage to beam position.