On the Coherence of Wittgensteinian Constructivism |
| |
Authors: | Amit Saad |
| |
Institution: | 1.Shalvata Mental Health Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel-Aviv University,Tel-Aviv,Israel |
| |
Abstract: | Michael Dummett presents a modus tollens argument against a Wittgensteinian conception of meaning. In a series of papers, Dummett claims that Wittgensteinian considerations entail strict finitism. However, by a “sorites argument”, Dummett argues that strict finitism is incoherent and therefore questions these Wittgensteinian considerations.In this paper, I will argue that Dummett’s sorites argument fails to undermine strict finitism. I will claim that the argument is based on two questionable assumptions regarding some strict finitist sets of natural numbers. It will be shown that strict finitism entails none of these assumptions. Hence, the argument does not prove that the view is internally incoherent, and consequently, Dummett fails to undermine the Wittgensteinian conception of meaning. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|