首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Elucidating gating effects for hydrogen sorption in MFU-4-type triazolate-based metal-organic frameworks featuring different pore sizes
Authors:Denysenko Dmytro  Grzywa Maciej  Tonigold Markus  Streppel Barbara  Krkljus Ivana  Hirscher Michael  Mugnaioli Enrico  Kolb Ute  Hanss Jan  Volkmer Dirk
Institution:1. Institute of Physics, Chair of Solid State and Material Science, Augsburg University, Universit?tsstrasse 1, 86135 Augsburg (Germany), Fax: (+49)?821‐598‐5955;2. Institute of Inorganic Chemistry II—Materials and Catalysis, Ulm University, Albert‐Einstein‐Allee 11, 89081 Ulm (Germany);3. Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, Heisenbergstrasse 3, 70569 Stuttgart (Germany);4. Institute of Physical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz, Welderweg 11, 55099 Mainz (Germany)
Abstract:A highly porous member of isoreticular MFU‐4‐type frameworks, Zn5Cl4(BTDD)3] (MFU‐4l(arge)) (H2‐BTDD=bis(1H‐1,2,3‐triazolo4,5‐b],4′,5′‐i])dibenzo1,4]dioxin), has been synthesized using ZnCl2 and H2‐BTDD in N,N‐dimethylformamide as a solvent. MFU‐4l represents the first example of MFU‐4‐type frameworks featuring large pore apertures of 9.1 Å. Here, MFU‐4l serves as a reference compound to evaluate the origin of unique and specific gas‐sorption properties of MFU‐4, reported previously. The latter framework features narrow‐sized pores of 2.5 Å that allow passage of sufficiently small molecules only (such as hydrogen or water), whereas molecules with larger kinetic diameters (e.g., argon or nitrogen) are excluded from uptake. The crystal structure of MFU‐4l has been solved ab initio by direct methods from 3D electron‐diffraction data acquired from a single nanosized crystal through automated electron diffraction tomography (ADT) in combination with electron‐beam precession. Independently, it has been solved using powder X‐ray diffraction. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and variable‐temperature X‐ray powder diffraction (XRPD) experiments carried out on MFU‐4l indicate that it is stable up to 500 °C (N2 atmosphere) and up to 350 °C in air. The framework adsorbs 4 wt % hydrogen at 20 bar and 77 K, which is twice the amount compared to MFU‐4. The isosteric heat of adsorption starts for low surface coverage at 5 kJ mol?1 and decreases to 3.5 kJ mol?1 at higher H2 uptake. In contrast, MFU‐4 possesses a nearly constant isosteric heat of adsorption of ca. 7 kJ mol?1 over a wide range of surface coverage. Moreover, MFU‐4 exhibits a H2 desorption maximum at 71 K, which is the highest temperature ever measured for hydrogen physisorbed on metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).
Keywords:adsorption  hydrogen  metal–organic frameworks  thermal desorption spectroscopy  triazolates
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号