Some remarks on permutation designs

A definition of isomorphism of two permutation designs is proposed, which differs from the definition in Bandt [J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A21 (1976), 384–392]. The proposed definition has the (generally required) property that the allowed permutations always transform a permutation design into a permutation design. It is shown that the n permutation designs coming from the partitioning of S_n into permutation designs, as constructed in Bandt [J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A21 (1976), 384–392] are all isomorphic. Further we find that this modified definition does not increase the number of nonisomorphic (6, 4) permutation designs. The same investigation showed that one of the designs, claimed to be a (6, 4) permutation design in [J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A21 (1976), 384–392], is actually not a (6, 4) permutation design.