"象"的境界与"数"的真理--作为中西古典美学意义之发端的老子"象论" 与毕达哥拉斯学派的"数论"

老子“象论”与毕达哥拉斯学派“数论”分别构成了中西古典美学的意义之发端。两在思想路向上存在着巨大的差异。老子“象论”及其人生论的思想路向启发了中国古典美学中的“意象”本体论和以“境界”为最高审美理想的思想;毕达哥拉斯学派“数论”及其知识论的思想路向启发了西方古典美学中的“形式”本体论和以“真理”为最高审美理想的思想。

The Situation of "Image" and the Truth of "Number"--Laozi's "Image" Theory and Pythagorean School's "Number" Theory

Laozi' s " image" theory is the start of Chinese classical aesthetic meaning. Similarly, Pythagorean School' "So does number" theory in western classical aesthetics. There are great differences between them. Laozi' s " image " theory and his philosophy of life produced essential influence on the ontology of "imagination" and the loftiest aesthetic ideal of "imaginary situation" in Chinese classical aesthetics. Pythagorean School' s " number" theory and their philosophy of knowledge exerted important influence on the production of the ontology of "form" and the loftiest aesthetic ideal of "truth" in western classical aesthetics.