Renal perfusion in acute kidney injury with DCE-MRI: Deconvolution analysis versus two-compartment filtration model |
| |
Authors: | Frank G Zöllner Fabian Zimmer Sarah Klotz Simone Hoeger Lothar R Schad |
| |
Institution: | 1. Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany;2. Department of Medicine V, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeTo investigate the results of different pharmacokinetic models of a quantitative analysis of renal blood flow (RBF) in acute kidney injury using deconvolution analysis and a two-compartment renal filtration model.Materials and methodsMRI data of ten male Lewis rats were analyzed retrospectively. Six animals were subjected to unilateral acute kidney injury and underwent perfusion imaging by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Renal blood flow was estimated from regions-of-interest depicting the cortex in the DCE-MRI perfusion maps. The perfusion models were compared by a paired t-test and Bland–Altman plots.ResultsNo significant difference was found between the two compartment model and the deconvolution analysis (P = 0.2807). Differences between healthy and diseased kidney in the AKI model were significant for both methods (P < 0.05). A Bland–Altman plot showed no systematic errors, and values were equally distributed around the mean difference between the methods lying within the range of 1.96 standard deviations.ConclusionBoth quantification strategies could detect the kidneys that were impaired by AKI. When just aiming at RBF as a marker, a deconvolution analysis can provide similar values as the 2CFM. If functional parameters beyond RBF like glomerular filtration rate are needed, the 2CFM should be employed. |
| |
Keywords: | Renal blood flow Acute kidney injury DCE-MRI Quantification Comparison |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|