Theoretical study of first-row transition metal porphyrins and their carbonyl complexes

The equilibrium geometry, relative energies, normal mode frequencies, and electron and spin density distributions for first-row transition metal porphyrins M(P) (M is a transition metal in the oxidation state +2, P = C₂₀H₁₂N₄) and their five-and six-coordinate carbonyl complexes M(P)CO and M(P)(CO)(AB) (AB = CO, CN^?, CS) in different spin states have been calculated by the density functional theory B3LYP method with the 6-31G and 6-31G* basis sets. The energies of binding of the CO group to M(P) molecules D(M-CO) have been estimated. The calculated properties change as a function of the metal, the number of carbonyl groups (shown for Fe(P) as an example), and the multiplicity. Calculations show that, for five-coordinate complexes M(P)CO with M = Ti and V, high-spin states and significant D(M-CO) energies are typical. For Fe(P)CO, a singlet with a small D(M-CO) energy is preferable. For Cr(P)CO and Mn(P)CO (which also have small D(M-CO) energies), the states with different spins, which strongly differ in geometry and electronic structure, are close in energy, within 0.1–02. eV. The energy of binding of CO to M(P)CO (M = Cr, Mn, Fe) is considerably higher than the energy of binding of CO to M(P), which is evidence that the transformation of five-coordinate metalloporphyrins into six-coordinate ones is energetically favorable. The behavior of the D(M-CO) energies is interpreted using a qualitative model that considers not only the effects of participation (or nonparticipation) of “active” $ d_{x^2 - y^2 } The equilibrium geometry, relative energies, normal mode frequencies, and electron and spin density distributions for first-row transition metal porphyrins M(P) (M is a transition metal in the oxidation state +2, P = C₂₀H₁₂N₄) and their five-and six-coordinate carbonyl complexes M(P)CO and M(P)(CO)(AB) (AB = CO, CN⁻, CS) in different spin states have been calculated by the density functional theory B3LYP method with the 6-31G and 6-31G* basis sets. The energies of binding of the CO group to M(P) molecules D(M-CO) have been estimated. The calculated properties change as a function of the metal, the number of carbonyl groups (shown for Fe(P) as an example), and the multiplicity. Calculations show that, for five-coordinate complexes M(P)CO with M = Ti and V, high-spin states and significant D(M-CO) energies are typical. For Fe(P)CO, a singlet with a small D(M-CO) energy is preferable. For Cr(P)CO and Mn(P)CO (which also have small D(M-CO) energies), the states with different spins, which strongly differ in geometry and electronic structure, are close in energy, within 0.1–02. eV. The energy of binding of CO to M(P)CO (M = Cr, Mn, Fe) is considerably higher than the energy of binding of CO to M(P), which is evidence that the transformation of five-coordinate metalloporphyrins into six-coordinate ones is energetically favorable. The behavior of the D(M-CO) energies is interpreted using a qualitative model that considers not only the effects of participation (or nonparticipation) of “active” , and , d _xz , and d _yz AO in bonding of M to the P ring and axial ligands, but also the fraction of the total bond energy consumed for the preparation (promotion) of those “valence states” of the M(P) molecules that are realized in M(P)CO and M(P)(CO)(AB) complexes. For the series of compounds Fe(P)(CO)₂ − Fe(P)(CO)(CS) − Fe(P)(CS)₂ − Fe(P)(CO)(CN⁻) in the singlet, triplet, and ionized states, the trans influence of axial ligands in low-spin metalloporphyrins is shown to follow the same qualitative scheme as is typical of octahedral transition metal complexes: in mixed-ligand complexes (as compared to the symmetric ones), the stronger bond becomes shorter and even stronger, while the weaker bond becomes longer and even weaker. It is assumed that the same scheme will persist for more complicated low-spin six-coordinate metalloporphyrins in the states with the vacant AO and occupied d _xz and d _xz AOs involved in bonding with both axial ligands with the filled shell. Original Russian Text ? O.P. Charkin, A.V. Makarov, and N.M. Klimenko, 2008, published in Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii, 2008, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 781–794.