Conformity and precision of CO2 densimetry in CO2 inclusions: microthermometry versus Raman microspectroscopic densimetry

To assess the ability of densimetry for CO₂ fluid in CO₂ inclusions, we compare two methods, microthermometry and Raman microspectroscopic densimetry for CO₂. The comparative experiment was performed for nine CO₂ inclusions in three mantle xenoliths. The results are as follows: (1) microthermometry precisely determines CO₂ density with the range of 0.65 to 1.18 g/cm³ compared with Raman microspectroscopic densimetry; (2) CO₂ density obtained by Raman microspectroscopic densimetry is fairly consistent with that by microthermometry; (3) it is hard to determine CO₂ density in CO₂ inclusion with diameter of less than around 3 µm using microthermometry; and (4) microthermometry can be applied only to the CO₂ inclusion whose CO₂ density ranges from around 0.65 to 1.18 g/cm³, whereas the Raman microspectroscopic densimetry is applicable to CO₂ density ranging from 0.1 to 1.24 g/cm³. The above features carry the potential for estimation of depth origin of mantle‐derived rocks. The depth where the rocks were trapped by host magma can be estimated using both geothermometric data and CO₂ fluid density in CO₂ inclusions in the rocks. Typical precisions of density of CO₂ in CO₂ inclusions obtained by the Raman microspectroscopic densimetry (~0.01 g/cm³) and by the microthermometry (< 0.001 g/cm³) correspond to uncertainties in the depth origin of 2.4 km and < 1.7 km, respectively, at 1000 ± 50 °C. In case of the mantle under 750–1250 °C and 1 GPa, the CO₂ fluid has a density ranging from 1.06 g/cm³ to 1.21 g/cm³, which are well measured by the Raman microspectroscopic densimetry. Combination of both densimetries for CO₂ in mantle minerals elucidates the deep structure of the Earth. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.