Model for Plateau border drainage of power-law fluid with mobile interface and its application to foam drainage

A model for drainage of a power-law fluid through a Plateau border is proposed which accounts for the actual Plateau border geometry and interfacial mobility. The non-dimensionalized Navier-Stokes equations have been solved using finite element method to obtain the contours of velocity within the Plateau border cross section and average Plateau border velocity in terms of dimensionless inverse surface viscosity and power-law rheological parameters. The velocity coefficient, the correction for the average velocity through a Plateau border of actual geometry compared to that for a simplified circular geometry of the same area of cross section, was expressed as a function of dimensionless inverse surface viscosity and flow behavior index of the power-law fluid. The results of this improved model for Plateau border drainage were then incorporated in a previously developed foam drainage model G. Narsimhan, J. Food Eng. 14 (1991) 139] to predict the evolution of liquid holdup profiles in a standing foam. Foam drainage was found to be slower for actual Plateau border cross section compared to circular geometry and faster for higher interfacial mobility and larger bubble size. Evolution of liquid holdup profiles in a standing foam formed by whipping and stabilized by 0.1% beta-lactoglobulin in the presence of xanthan gum when subjected to 16g and 45g centrifugal force fields was measured using magnetic resonance imaging for different xanthan gum concentrations. Drainage resulted in the formation of a separate liquid layer at the bottom at longer times. Measured bubble size, surface shear viscosity of beta-lactoglobulin solutions and literature values of power-law parameters of xanthan gum solution were employed in the current model to predict the evolution of liquid holdup profile which compared well with the experimental data. Newtonian model for foam drainage for zero shear viscosity underpredicted drainage rates and did not agree with the experimental data.