首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study
Authors:Alessio Ishizaka  Markus Lusti
Affiliation:(1) Grande Ecole de Management, Audencia Nantes, 8 route de la Jonelière, 44312 Nantes Cedex 3, France;(2) WWZ/Wirtschaftsinformatik, University of Basel, Petersgraben 51, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
Abstract:A heated discussion has arisen over the “best” priorities derivation method. Using a Monte Carlo simulation this article compares and evaluates the solutions of four AHP ratio scaling methods: the right eigenvalue method, the left eigenvalue method, the geometric mean and the mean of normalized values. Matrices with different dimensions and degree of impurities are randomly constructed. We observe a high level of agreement between the different scaling techniques. The number of ranking contradictions increases with the dimension of the matrix and the inconsistencies. However, these contradictions affect only close priorities.
Keywords:Multi-criteria decision making  Simulation  AHP  Eigenvalue  Geometric mean
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号