首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

结构动力响应数值算法耗散和超调特性设计
引用本文:于开平,邹经湘. 结构动力响应数值算法耗散和超调特性设计[J]. 力学学报, 2005, 37(4): 467-476. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2005-4-2004-219
作者姓名:于开平  邹经湘
作者单位:哈尔滨工业大学航天工程与力学系344信箱,150001
基金项目:哈尔滨工业大学校基金(HIT.2002.02)资助项目
摘    要:对结构动力响应数值计算问题提出引入多个自由参数来获得所希望的算法特性. 多参数的一个明显的好处就是在算法设计上有更大的自由空间. 利用这些自由参数获得了两个新的无条件稳定、有二阶精度的、有好的耗散和没有超调的单步时间直接积分算法. 在存在阻尼情况下基于有限差分分析理论证明了新算法的这些特性. 其中一个有高频渐进消去特性,且在有阻尼情况下与Houbolt方法相比对高频有更强的耗散. 另一个在低频极限无耗散,高频耗散可以用一自由参数控制. 超调分析结果显示两个新算法都不显示超调,而HHT方法不仅有速度超调,还有位移超调. 最后使用一些算例并通过与传统方法的比较数值地验证了理论分析结果.

关 键 词:结构动力响应  时间积分算法  有限差分分析  数值耗散  超调
文章编号:0459-1879(2005)04-0467-10
收稿时间:2004-05-28
修稿时间:2005-01-18

Two time integral algorithms with numerical dissipation and without overshoot for structural dynamic
Yu Kaiping,ZOU Jingxiang. Two time integral algorithms with numerical dissipation and without overshoot for structural dynamic[J]. chinese journal of theoretical and applied mechanics, 2005, 37(4): 467-476. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2005-4-2004-219
Authors:Yu Kaiping  ZOU Jingxiang
Abstract:The seven free parameters were introduced into the governing equation of a motion to design new direct integral algorithms for solving structural dynamics problems. Two new one-step schemes were presented by selecting free parameters in the process of algorithmic finite difference analysis. The proposed methods are implicit, unconditionally stable, second-order accurate, numerically dissipative, and no overshot. One of the algorithms is able to annihilate the high-frequency modes asymptotically, and is more dissipative than Houbolt method for damped system. The numerical dissipation of the other method is minimum in the low-frequency regime and is controllable in the high-frequency regime. An analysis of the overshoot property is directly performed for damped system and show that proposed two algorithms no exhibits overshoot, while the HHT-a scheme suffers from the displacement and velocity overshoot simultaneously when damping existed. Finally, the results of the analysis were validated numerically by the comparison with the Newmark, HHT-a and Houbolt methods by analyzing a simulated two degree-of-freedom system representing a large structural.
Keywords:structural dynamic response   time integral algorithm   finite difference analysis   numerical dissipation   overshoot
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《力学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《力学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号