Concurrent combined verification: reducing false positives in automated NMR structure verification through the evaluation of multiple challenge control structures |
| |
Authors: | Sergey S. Golotvin Rostislav Pol Ryan R. Sasaki Asya Nikitina Philip Keyes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Advanced Chemistry Development, Ltd, Moscow Department, , Moscow, Russia;2. Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., , Toronto, ON, Canada;3. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, , Princeton, NJ, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Automated structure verification using 1H NMR data or a combination of 1H and heteronuclear single‐quantum correlation (HSQC) data is gaining more interest as a routine application for qualitative evaluation of large compound libraries produced by synthetic chemistry. The goal of this automated software method is to identify a manageable subset of compounds and data that require human review. In practice, the automated method will flag structure and data combinations that exhibit some inconsistency (i.e. strange chemical shifts, conflicts in multiplicity, or overestimated and underestimated integration values) and validate those that appear consistent. One drawback of this approach is that no automated system can guarantee that all passing structures are indeed correct structures. The major reason for this is that approaches using only 1H or even 1H and HSQC spectra often do not provide sufficient information to properly distinguish between similar structures. Therefore, current implementations of automated structure verification systems allow, in principle, false positive results. Presented in this work is a method that greatly reduces the probability of an automated validation system passing incorrect structures (i.e. false positives). This novel method was applied to automatically validate 127 non‐proprietary compounds from several commercial sources. Presented also is the impact of this approach on false positive and false negative results. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
Keywords: | NMR 1H 13C HSQC NMR prediction automated structure verification concurrent verification combined verification |
|
|