Comparison of Two Reformulation-Linearization Technique Based Linear Programming Relaxations for Polynomial Programming Problems

In this paper, we compare two strategies for constructing linear programmingrelaxations for polynomial programming problems using aReformulation-Linearization Technique (RLT). RLT involves an automaticreformulation of the problem via the addition of certain nonlinear impliedconstraints that are generated by using the products of the simple boundingrestrictions (among other products), and a subsequent linearization based onvariable redefinitions. We prove that applying RLT directly to the originalpolynomial program produces a bound that dominates in the sense of being atleast as tight as the value obtained when RLT is applied to the jointcollection of all equivalent quadratic problems that could be constructed byrecursively defining additional variables as suggested by Shor.