首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Trapping of hydride forming elements within miniature electrothermal devices. Part 2. Investigation of collection of arsenic and selenium hydrides on a surface and in a cavity of a graphite rod
Affiliation:1. Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;2. Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;3. Institute for Combustion and Gas Dynamics – Reactive Fluids, Carl-Benz-Straβe 199, 47057 Duisburg, Germany;4. Center for Nanointegration Duisburg Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Carl-Benz-Straβe 199, 47057 Duisburg, Germany;1. Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the ASCR, v. v. i., Veveří 97, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic;2. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Chemistry Department, 15030 Burdur, Turkey
Abstract:The interaction of arsenic and selenium hydrides with bare and modified graphite was investigated by atomic absorption spectrometry and by radiotracer technique using 75Se radionuclide in a laboratory made brass cylindrical chamber equipped with a vertical quartz tube torch for supporting miniature hydrogen diffusion flame atomizer. Strong interaction was observed at elevated temperatures above 800 °C. In contrast to the very often-reported data for conventional graphite tube atomizers, this high temperature interaction was also accompanied by a pronounced trapping of analytes at elevated temperatures close to 1100–1200 °C when modified graphite was used. Comparing modifiers tested (Ir, Pt and Rh), iridium appeared the only useful permanent modifier. Among various graphite-rod traps designed, the most efficient trapping of analytes was achieved in a graphite cavity. The net selenium trapping efficiencies of approximately 53% and 70% were found by radiotracer technique for the iridium-treated graphite surface and the iridium-treated graphite cavity, respectively. In contrast to the molybdenum surface, bare graphite did not exhibit any significant trapping effect. Trapping isotherms obtained at different temperatures displayed non-linear course in the range up to the upper limit of the analytical relevance of 100 ng of an analyte, indicating a limited trapping capacity of the modified graphite surface and the same trapping mechanism at low and elevated temperatures applied (300–1300 °C). Radiography experiments with 75Se radiotracer showed that a major part of selenium was collected within the small cavity of the graphite rod and that selenium was also deposited after the trapping and vaporization steps in the trap chamber and on the quartz tube wall of the burner. Complementary experiments performed with the conventional transversally heated graphite tube and with bare and thermally shielded injection capillaries for hydride introduction, showed that the pronounced trapping effect could not be observed at elevated temperatures in conventional systems equipped with the bare capillary. The losses of analytes in the non-shielded bare introduction capillary exposed to the heat decrease the transport efficiency of hydrides into the graphite tube, and consequently they cause reduction of the overall trapping efficiency at elevated temperatures.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号