Detection of microcystins with protein phosphatase inhibition assay, high-performance liquid chromatography-UV detection and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: Comparison of methods

A colorimetric protein phosphatase inhibition assay (PPI assay), a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test and different HPLC methods using UV detection were compared for the detection of cyanobacterial hepatotoxins, microcystins (MCYST) and nodularin. The suitability of the methods to detect different toxin variants was evaluated by using pure toxins and laboratory cultures as well as water and bloom samples of toxic cyanobacteria. The emphasis of the study was on the analysis of polar demethyl microcystin variants that are common in nature but for which there exist no commercial standards. The IC₅₀ values of MCYST-LR for the PPI assay and the ELISA test were 2.2-2.5 and 0.26-0.38 μg l⁻¹, respectively. The most important factors that decreased toxin recovery in sample treatment were the use of C₁₈ cartridges and polypropylene containers. Good recoveries of toxins were obtained by using hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced (Oasis HLB, Waters) cartridges for concentrating the samples. The results obtained with the PPI assay, the ELISA test and HPLC correlated quantitatively well with the exception of d-Asp³] microcystins. Concentrations of d-Asp³]MCYST-RR measured with the PPI assay were only 5% of those obtained by the ELISA test and HPLC. Concentrations of hydrophobic microcystin variants were lower when analysed with ELISA than with the other methods. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has set a guideline value of 1 μg l⁻¹ for the world-wide most common microcystin variant, MCYST-LR in drinking water. Since the quantitative ranges of the PPI assay and the ELISA test are within microcystin concentrations in natural waters, and both tests are easy to perform, they show potential for routine use in the screening and monitoring of microcystins from drinking water supplies and from recreational waters.