Conformational analysis of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines

Ring and nitrogen inversion account for the conformational equilibria of 3-phenyl-1, 2,3, 4-tetrahydroiso-quinolines. In order to quantitate the relative contribution of each conformer to the equilibrium, we undertook a molecular mechanics study on several substituted 3-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydroisoquinolines. Predictions from calculations were checked against cmr chemical shift data. No boat conformation contributed significantly to the equilibrium. A general result of our calculations is that in all cases the 3-phenyl group in the equatorial position is strongly favored (by at least 2.50 kcal/mole). For 3-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydroisoquinolines without substitution at nitrogen, N-H in equatorial position is preferred over the axial conformer, although the energy difference between both is always small (0.30–1.10 kcal/mole). For the cis-1,3-disubstituted compounds the le'3e conformers are the only species present (at least 99.8%). The calculated energy differences between the la′3a conformer and the le′3e conformer are always large (3.80–6.10 kcal/mole for the NHe conformers and 3.60–3.80 kcal/mole for the NHa conformers). The lack of a γ_1a upfield shift at C3 also points to the preference for the pseudoequatorial-equatorial conformer. For N-methyl-3-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline a preference for the NMe group in the equatorial position is predicted (0.60–2.00 kcal/mole). The small downfield shift at C4 (γ_Na = 0.5 ppm) is consistent with the equatorial NMe preference. For the cis-1,2,3-trisubstituted compounds no significant γ_1a effect at C3 (γ_1a = -0.2 and 1.0 ppm) or γ_Na effect at C4 (γ_Na = 0.1 and 0.4 ppm) is observed. For these compounds, deformations due to steric congestion are evidenced by the deviation from the values of the C4a-C8a-Cl-N and C4a-C4-C3-N torsional angles, as compared to less crowded 3-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines. Here the heterocyclic ring adopts a distorted half-chair conformation.