Mechanism of olefin metathesis with catalysis by ruthenium carbene complexes: density functional studies on model systems

Gradient-corrected (BP86) density functional calculations were used to study alternative mechanisms of the metathesis reactions between ethene and model catalysts [(PH(3))(L)Cl(2)Ru[double bond]CH(2)] with L=PH3 (I) and L=C(3)N(2)H(4)=imidazol-2-ylidene (II). On the associative pathway, the initial addition of ethene is calculated to be rate-determining for both catalysts (Delta G(22-25)*[double bond] kcal mol(-1)). The dissociative pathway starts with the dissociation of phosphane, which is rather facile (Delta G(298)* is approximately equal to 5-10 kcal mol(-1)). The resulting active species (L)Cl(2)Ru[double bond]CH(2) can coordinate ethene cis or trans to L. The cis addition is unfavorable and mechanistically irrelevant (Delta G(298)* is approximately equal to 21-25 kcal mol(-1)). The trans coordination is barrierless, and the rate-determining step in the subsequent catalytic cycle is either ring closure of the complex to yield the ruthenacyclobutane (catalyst I, Delta G(298)*=12 kcal mol(-1)), or the reverse reaction (catalyst II, ring opening, Delta G(298)*=10 kcal mol(-1)), that is, II is slightly more active than I. For both catalysts, the dissociative mechanism with trans olefin coordination is favored. The relative energies of the species on this pathway can be tuned by ligand variation, as seen in (PMe(3))(2)Cl(2)Ru[double bond]CH(2) (III), in which phosphane dissociation is impeded and olefin insertion is facilitated relative to I. The differences in calculated relative energies for the model catalysts I-III can be rationalized in terms of electronic effects. Comparisons with experiment indicate that steric effects must also be considered for real catalysts containing bulky substituents.