Poly(thieno[3,4‐b]‐1,4‐oxathiane) and poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene‐co‐thieno[3,4‐b]‐1,4‐oxathiane)/poly(styrene sulfonic sodium): Preparation,characterization, and optoelectronic performance

In this work, the asymmetrical analog of 3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), thieno[3,4‐b]‐1,4‐oxathiane (EOTT), was synthesized and chemically polymerized first in aqueous solution using poly(styrene sulfonic sodium) (PSS) as the polyelectrolyte to yield poly(thieno[3,4‐b]‐1,4‐oxathiane) (PEOTT)/PSS. As‐formed film exhibited low electrical conductivity (～10^?4 S/cm). Alternatively, EOTT together with EDOT (in different molar ratio of 1:1 and 1:5) was copolymerized and the polymer poly(EOTT‐co‐EDOT)/PSS had electrical conductivity of 10^?1 S/cm. After dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) treatment, the electrical conductivity was enhanced to 10⁰ S/cm; however, the conductivity of the above homopolymer was reduced (～10^?5 S/cm). Raman spectroscopy was used to interpret conductivity enhancement or reduction after DMSO treatment. The conductivity decrease of PEOTT/PSS compared to poly(EOTT‐co‐EDOT)/PSS may arise from the conformational change of PEOTT backbone from the quasi‐planar to the distorted planar mode induced by PSS^–/PSSH through ionic interaction. Kinetic studies revealed that the copolymer had high coloration efficiencies (375 cm²/C), low switching voltages (?0.8 to +0.6 V), decent contrast ratios (45%), moderate response time (1.0 s), excellent stability, and color persistence. An electrochromic device employing poly(3‐methylthiophene) and poly(EOTT‐co‐EDOT)/PSS as the anode and cathode materials was also studied. From these results, poly(EOTT‐co‐EDOT)/PSS would be a promising candidate material for organic electronics. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015 , 53, 2285–2297