The properties of calibration errors in the analysis of reduced sulfur compounds by the combination of a loop injection system and gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection

In order to evaluate the extent of analytical biases involved in the GC calibration, we conducted a series of experiments to examine the calibration methods of trace gas components. For the purpose of this comparative study, gaseous standards of reduced sulfur compounds (RSC) including hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), methanethiol (CH₃SH), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), carbon disulfide (CS₂), and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) were calibrated by the combination of a GC/PFPD technique and a loop-injection method. In the course of this study, two different types of calibration methods were tested and compared: incremental-injection of a given standard with the fixed standard concentration (FSC) versus injection of multiple standards (with different concentrations) at the fixed standard volume (FSV). In the case of the FSV calibration, a notable increase in the GC sensitivity is apparent with decreasing loop size (or injection volume). For instance, the calibration slope for RSC obtained using a 10 μl loop system was approximately three times higher than that for a 250 μl one. However, the results obtained by the FSC method exhibit much poorer sensitivity than its counterpart with slight differences in their sensitivities across different standard concentrations (due to such factors as the matrix effect from varying injection volumes). Thus, the overall results of this study confirm that the detailed characterization of the selected calibration method (e.g., the use of FSV approach relative to FSC) is of primary significance to perform an accurate quantification of trace gases.