|
|||||
|
|
Closure,Defeasibility and Conclusive Reasons |
|||
| Authors: | Claudio de Almeida | ||
| Affiliation: | (1) PUCRS (Brazil), Rua Goncalves Dias 319, ap. 901, Porto Alegre, RS, 90130-061, Brazil | ||
| Abstract: | It is argued, on the basis of new counterexamples, that neither knowledge nor epistemic justification (or “epistemic rationality”) can reasonably be thought to be closed under logical implication. The argument includes an attempt to reconcile the fundamental intuitions of the opposing parties in the debate.
|
||
| Keywords: | KeywordHeading" > Epistemic closure Defeasibility Conclusive reasons Knowledge Epistemic justification Epistemic rationality | ||
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |||
