| Abstract: | Bond-charge increments (BCIs) are additive parameters used to assign atomic charges for the MMFF force field. BCI parameters are classified parsimoniously according to two atom types and the bond order. We show how BCIs may be fitted rapidly by linear least squares to the calculated ab initio electrostatic potential (ESP) or to the electrostatic field. When applied simultaneously to a set of compounds or conformations, the method yields consensus values of the BCIs. The method can also derive conventional “ESP-fit” atomic charges with improved numerical stability. The method may be generalized to determine atom multipoles, multicenter charge templates, or electronegativities, but not polarizability or hardness. We determine 65 potential-derived (PD) BCI parameters, which are classified as in MMFF, by fitting the 6-31G* ESP or the electrostatic field of the 45 compounds in the original MMFF94 training set. We compare the consensus BCIs with classified BCIs that were fit to each molecule individually and with “unique-bond” BCIs (ESP-derived atom charges). Consensus BCIs give a satisfactory representation for about half of the structures and are robust to the adjustment of the alkyl CH bond increment to the zero value employed in MMFF94. We highlight problems at three levels: Point approximation: the potential near lone pairs on sulfur and to some extent nitrogen cannot be represented just by atom charges. Bond classification: BCIs classified according to MMFF atom types cannot represent all delocalized electronic effects. The problem is especially severe for bonds between atoms of equivalent MMFF type, whose BCI must be taken as zero. Consensus: discrepancies that occur in forming the consensus across the training set indicate the need for a more detailed classification of BCIs. Contradictions are seen (e.g., between acetic acid and acetone and between guanidine and formaldehydeimine). We then test the three sets of PD-BCIs in energy minimizations of hydrogen-bonded dimers. Unique-bond BCIs used with the MMFF buffered 14–7 potential reproduce unscaled quantum chemical dimer interaction energies within 0.9 kcal/mol root mean square (or 0.5, omitting two N-oxides). These energies are on average 0.7 (or 0.5) kcal/mol too weak to reproduce the scaled quantum mechanical (SQM) results that are a benchmark for MMFF parameterization. Consensus BCIs tend to weaken the dimer energy by a further 0.4–0.6 kcal/mol. Thus, consensus PD-BCIs can serve as a starting point for MMFF parameterization, but they require both systematic and individual adjustments. Used with a “harder” AMBER-like Lennard–Jones potential, unique-bond PD-BCIs without systematic adjustment give dimer energies in fairly good agreement with SQM. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 20: 1495–1516, 1999 |
