Reactivity differences between molecular and surface silanols in the preparation of homogeneous and heterogeneous olefin metathesis catalysts

The reaction of Mo(N)(CH₂tBu)₃ (1) and SiO_2-(700) generates (SiO)Mo(NH)(CHtBu)(CH₂tBu) (2) when performed in C₆H₆ (material 1/SiO_2-(700)]_C6H6). The grafting occurs presumably by protonation of the nitrido ligand to form an intermediate (SiO)Mo(NH)(CH₂tBu)₃ (3), a pentacoordinated complex, which decomposes into 2 and 2,2-dimethylpropane. While 1/SiO_2-(700)]_C6H6 is highly active in olefin metathesis, 1/SiO_2-(700)]_CH2Cl2 and 1/SiO_2-(700)]_THF are poorly active or inactive catalysts respectively. In contrast, when Mo(N)(CH₂tBu)₃ reacts with a molecular silanol derivative, a soluble model of the surface of SiO_2-(700), it yields a very stable complex, (c-C₅H₉)₇Si₇O₁₂SiO-Mo(NH)(CH₂tBu)₃ (3m), which does not spontaneously generate 2,2-dimethylpropane and an alkylidene complex in contrast to the surface complex. Moreover, 3m does not catalyse olefin metathesis at room temperature as it does not already contain the initiating carbene ligand, and it is necessary to heat up the reaction mixture to 110 °C to obtain low catalytic activity. Nevertheless, the complex 3m generates well-defined metallocarbenes when heated in the presence of PMe₃: (c-C₅H₉)₇Si₇O₁₂SiO-Mo(N)(CHtBu)(P(CH₃)₃)₂ (4m) as a 10:1 mixture of its syn and anti rotamers with the loss of 2 equiv. of 2,2-dimethylpropane.