Bias of cartilage T2 values related to method of calculation

Purpose

To determine how different methods for calculating T₂ affect the resulting T₂ values of patellar cartilage.

Materials and Methods

T₂-weighted images of patellar cartilage for 10 subjects were acquired using two MRI scanners. T₂ values of patellar cartilage were calculated using linear, weighted and nonlinear fitting algorithms for a monoexponential decay equation. T₂ values were also calculated for the superficial, middle and deep zones of the cartilage.

Results

All three methods of calculation resulted in significantly different T₂ values (P<.0001). The weighted calculation produced the highest T₂ values, and the nonlinear calculation produced the lowest T₂ values. The average difference of T₂ value between the methods was under 5 ms. Similar results were found in a zonal analysis of the tissue. The nonlinear calculation of T₂ consistently had the best fit to the acquired data.

Conclusion

The T₂ value of patellar cartilage depends on the method of calculation. It is unclear if larger T₂ value differences would be seen in subjects diagnosed with osteoarthritis. This study highlights the potential difficulty of comparing different studies with one another based on the method of T₂ calculation.