首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A quasi-multistart framework for global optimization of expensive functions using response surface models
Authors:Rommel G Regis  Christine A Shoemaker
Institution:1. Department of Mathematics, Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA, 19131, USA
2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA
3. School of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA
Abstract:We present the AQUARS (A QUAsi-multistart Response Surface) framework for finding the global minimum of a computationally expensive black-box function subject to bound constraints. In a traditional multistart approach, the local search method is blind to the trajectories of the previous local searches. Hence, the algorithm might find the same local minima even if the searches are initiated from points that are far apart. In contrast, AQUARS is a novel approach that locates the promising local minima of the objective function by performing local searches near the local minima of a response surface (RS) model of the objective function. It ignores neighborhoods of fully explored local minima of the RS model and it bounces between the best partially explored local minimum and the least explored local minimum of the RS model. We implement two AQUARS algorithms that use a radial basis function model and compare them with alternative global optimization methods on an 8-dimensional watershed model calibration problem and on 18 test problems. The alternatives include EGO, GLOBALm, MLMSRBF (Regis and Shoemaker in INFORMS J Comput 19(4):497–509, 2007), CGRBF-Restart (Regis and Shoemaker in J Global Optim 37(1):113–135 2007), and multi level single linkage (MLSL) coupled with two types of local solvers: SQP and Mesh Adaptive Direct Search (MADS) combined with kriging. The results show that the AQUARS methods generally use fewer function evaluations to identify the global minimum or to reach a target value compared to the alternatives. In particular, they are much better than EGO and MLSL coupled to MADS with kriging on the watershed calibration problem and on 15 of the test problems.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号