首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Multivariate Optimization and Validation of a CZE Method for the Analysis of Pridinol Mesylate and Meloxicam in Tablets
Authors:Silvana E Vignaduzzo  Luciana Vera-Candioti  Patricia M Castellano  H��ctor C Goicoechea  Teodoro S Kaufman
Institution:1. Pharmaceutical Analysis, Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Biochemical Sciences, National University of Rosario and Institute of Chemistry of Rosario (IQUIR, CONICET-UNR), Suipacha 531, S2002LRK, Rosario, Argentina
2. Laboratory of Analytical Development and Chemometrics (LADAQ), Analytical Chemistry I, Faculty of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, National University of the Litoral, University City, S3000ZAA, Santa Fe, Argentina
Abstract:A capillary zone electrophoresis method for the simultaneous determination of pridinol mesylate (PRI) and meloxicam (MEL) employing epinastine hydrochloride and piroxicam as internal standards, was developed and optimized employing experimental design and response surface methodologies. The separation was optimally achieved in less than 2 min at 30 kV in an uncoated fused-silica capillary (41.4 cm × 75 ??m I.D.), employing an 18 mmol L?1 sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 5.90) at 25 °C. Samples were injected in hydrodynamic mode (50 mbar, 5 s) and the analytes were spectrophotometrically detected at 200 nm. Method robustness was demonstrated by ANOVA of determinations performed under conditions slightly different from the optimum. The method was validated regarding separation selectivity (peak purity factors > 0.99), linearity and range (PRI = 17.6?C31.4 mg L?1; MEL = 66.5?C122.5 mg L?1), accuracy (PRI = 100.2?C101.9%; MEL = 98.9?C100.7%) and precision. The RSD values obtained were ??1.3% for injection repeatability and ??1.9% for intra-day precision. The limits of detection (1.0 and 0.9 mg L?1) and quantification (3.3 and 16.5 mg L?1) of PRI and MEL, respectively, were also determined. The method was successfully applied to the determination of both drugs in three brands of tablet formulations. No statistically significant differences were observed when these results were compared with those of a RP-HPLC method.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号