Designing Point Mutants to Detect Structural Coupling in a Heterotrimeric G Protein α‐subunit by NMR Spectroscopy†

To better understand the mechanism by which the activating signal is transmitted from the receptor‐interacting regions on the G protein α‐subunit (G_α) to the guanine nucleotide‐binding pocket, we generated and characterized mutant forms of G_α with alterations in switch II (Trp‐207→Phe) and the carboxyl‐terminus (Phe‐350→Ala). Previously reported bacterial expression methods for the high‐level production of a uniformly isotope‐labeled G_tα/G_i1α chimera, ChiT, were successfully used to isolate milligram quantities of ¹⁵N‐labeled mutant protein. NMR analysis showed that while the GDP/Mg²⁺‐bound state of both mutants shared an overall conformation similar to that of the GDP/Mg²⁺‐bound state of ChiT, formation of the “transition/activated” state in the presence of aluminum fluoride (AlF₄^?) revealed distinct differences between the wild‐type and mutant G_α subunits, particularly in the response of the ¹HN, ¹⁵N cross‐peak for the Trp‐254 indole in the Trp‐207→Phe mutant and the ¹HN, ¹⁵N cross‐peak for Ala‐350 in the Phe‐350→Ala mutant. Consistent with the NMR data, the F350→Ala mutant showed an increase in intrinsic fluorescence that was similar to G_tα and ChiT upon formation of the “transition/activated” state in the presence of AlF₄^?, whereas the intrinsic fluorescence of the Trp‐207→Phe mutant decreased. These results show that the substitution of key amino acid positions in G_α can effect structural changes that may compromise receptor interactions and GDP/GTP exchange.