Determination of arsenic by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry--comparison of sample introduction techniques

A comparison is made of four sample introduction techniques for the determination of As by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The techniques studied were 1) flow injection with pneumatic nebulization (FIA-PN), 2) direct electrothermal vaporization (ETV), 3) continuous hydride generation (HG) and 4) hydride generation with in situ trapping followed by electrothermal vaporization (HG-ETV). It was found that FIA-PN and ETV gave similar detection limits in concentration units (about 20 pg mL(-1)), although ETV had a much lower absolute detection limit (0.2 pg). Sample introduction by hydride generation gave an inferior detection limit (100-200 pg mL(-1)), also in combination with in situ trapping and ETV, owing to the blank signal from traces of As in NaBH4 which is difficult to eliminate. The results indicate that the more elaborate sample introduction techniques based on ETV and HG may not offer significant advantages compared to normal solution nebulization for the determination of As in simple sample matrices such as natural fresh waters, where matrix removal is not required.