Structure and H(2)-Loss Energies of OsHX(H(2))(CO)L(2) Complexes (L = P(t-Bu)(2)Me, P(i-Pr)(3); X = Cl, I, H): Attempted Correlation of (1)J(H-D), T(1min), and DeltaG()

1J(H-D), T(1min) and k(1) for H(2) dissociation from OsHX(H(2))(CO)L(2) have been measured for X = Cl, I, H (L = P(t-Bu)(2)Me or P(i-Pr)(3)), as well as for OsCl(2)(H(2))(CO)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2). For comparison, new data (including previously unobserved coupling constants) have been reported for W(HD)(CO)(3)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2). A comprehensive consideration of T(1min) data for over 20 dihydrogen complexes containing only 1-2 phosphines cis to H(2), together with a consideration of the shortest "conceivable" H-H distance for H(2) bound to a d(4) or d(6) metal, is used to argue that the "fast spinning" model is not appropriate for determining r(H-H) in such complexes. Regarding OsHX(H(2))(CO)L(2), the stronger electron-donor (lighter) halide, when cis to H(2), facilitates loss of H(2). The complete absence of pi-donor ability when X = H renders H(2) loss most difficult. However, a pi-donor trans to H(2) also makes H(2) loss unobservable. Within the series of isoelectronic, structurally analogous Os complexes, a longer H-H bond shows a larger DeltaG() for H(2) loss. However, this correlation does not continue to W(H(2))(CO)(3)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2), which has r(H-H) comparable to that of OsH(halide)(H(2))(CO)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2), but a significantly higher DeltaG(). This may originate from lack of a pi-donor ligand to compensate as H(2) leaves W.