首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

2022年诺贝尔物理学奖的科学内涵辨识
引用本文:葛惟昆.2022年诺贝尔物理学奖的科学内涵辨识[J].物理,2022,51(12):821-826.
作者姓名:葛惟昆
作者单位:1.清华大学物理系 北京 100084
摘    要:2022年的诺贝尔物理学奖,被一些人误解为证明了量子纠缠现象。实际上,包括爱因斯坦本人都承认量子纠缠,关键在于如何诠释。今年诺贝尔物理学奖的价值在于这几位物理学家以无可争辩的实验事实,证明了基于定域隐变量的贝尔不等式是不对的。目前的一些介绍文字,没有认真解释量子力学在理论上是如何批驳贝尔不等式的,同时虽对量子纠缠的物理价值多有阐述,但对其哲学意义却鲜有评述,对社会上滥用纠缠概念缺少直接批判和阐释。文章希望在这两方面有所补充。

关 键 词:量子纠缠  EPR佯谬  贝尔不等式  物理与哲学
收稿时间:2022-10-13

On the interpretation of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics
GE Wei-Kun.On the interpretation of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics[J].Physics,2022,51(12):821-826.
Authors:GE Wei-Kun
Institution:1.Depatment of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:There exists some misunderstanding that the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded for proving quantum entanglement. As a matter of fact, even Einstein himself admitted the quantum entanglement phenomenon; the problem is how to explain it. The value of this year's Nobel Prize in physics lies in the unambiguous experimental demonstration that the Bell's inequality expression based on local hidden variables is invalid. Many articles have been published on this event, but they lack a detailed derivation of the quantum mechanical contradiction to Bell's inequality. In addition, most, if not all, articles emphasize only the academic significance of quantum entanglement, with almost no comment on its philosophical meaning or criticism on the abuse of the concept of quantum entanglement. This paper intends to provide a supplement for these two aspects.
Keywords:quantum entanglement  EPR paradox  Bell's inequality  physics and philosophy
点击此处可从《物理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《物理》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号