Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Energy Engineering and Physics, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran;2. Radiation Application Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran;3. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;1. Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain;2. Centro Estatal de Atención Oncológica, SSM, Gertrudis Bocanegra 300, Col. Cuauhtémoc, C.P. 58020 Morelia, Michoacán, México;1. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands;2. Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Department, McGill University, Montréal, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | During the last few decades, accuracy in photon and electron radiotherapy has increased substantially. This is partly due to enhanced linear accelerator technology, providing more flexibility in field definition (e.g. the usage of computer-controlled dynamic multileaf collimators), which led to intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Important improvements have also been made in the treatment planning process, more specifically in the dose calculations. Originally, dose calculations relied heavily on analytic, semi-analytic and empirical algorithms. The more accurate convolution/superposition codes use pre-calculated Monte Carlo dose “kernels” partly accounting for tissue density heterogeneities. It is generally recognized that the Monte Carlo method is able to increase accuracy even further. Since the second half of the 1990s, several Monte Carlo dose engines for radiotherapy treatment planning have been introduced. To enable the use of a Monte Carlo treatment planning (MCTP) dose engine in clinical circumstances, approximations have been introduced to limit the calculation time. In this paper, the literature on MCTP is reviewed, focussing on patient modeling, approximations in linear accelerator modeling and variance reduction techniques. An overview of published comparisons between MC dose engines and conventional dose calculations is provided for phantom studies and clinical examples, evaluating the added value of MCTP in the clinic. An overview of existing Monte Carlo dose engines and commercial MCTP systems is presented and some specific issues concerning the commissioning of a MCTP system are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|