首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Implementation and examination of a new drop shape analysis algorithm to measure contact angle and surface tension from the diameters of two sessile drops
Institution:1. Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King’s College Rd., Toronto, Ont, Canada M5S-3G8;2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA-01854, USA;1. College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China;2. Emergency Department, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China;1. Research Institute of Materials Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
Abstract:The performance of a new algorithm developed to measure contact angle and surface tension of sessile drops is examined. To calculate the contact angle and surface tension, the new algorithm (ADSA-TD) requires the radius (contact or equatorial) and volume of two sessile drops of different sizes that are placed on the same surface. Initially, the algorithm was tested using synthetic drops (synthetic or theoretical drops are produced by numerical integration of the Laplace equation). The radii and volumes of synthetic drops were used as ADSA-TD inputs. The calculated contact angle (θ) and surface tension (γ) by ADSA-TD matched perfectly the assumed values of θ and γ used to produce the synthetic drops, confirming theoretically the validity of the new algorithm. In the next step, the sensitivity of the algorithm to input errors was examined. It was shown experimentally that both calculated contact angle and surface tension are affected by the errors in volume and radius. Besides the error in input values, it was shown that the size difference between the paired drops and the differences in their contact angles would affect the output of ADSA-TD. As it turns out, the calculated surface tension is so sensitive to the above factors that ADSA-TD does not appear to be promising as a surface tension measurement technique. However, ADSA-TD produced acceptable contact angle values as compared to measurements made by other proven techniques such as axisymmetric drop shape analysis-profile. Thus, ADSA-TD may be of interest as a contact angle measurement technique which does not require the liquid surface tension as input.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号