首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

铬法与锰法测定地表水COD值的研究
引用本文:关共凑,廖丽萍,黄耀威.铬法与锰法测定地表水COD值的研究[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版),2003,21(4):53-55.
作者姓名:关共凑  廖丽萍  黄耀威
作者单位:佛山科学技术学院,旅游与资源环境系,广东,佛山,528000
摘    要:通过采用铬法与锰法测定佛山科学技术学院校园湖水COD值以及铬法与锰法分析条件、氧化率的相互比较.其结果表明:铬法精度高于锰法,铬法比锰法氧化完全,因此,采用铬法来作为控制有机污染物综合性指标比用锰法更为适宜,在测定清洁的地表水COD值时可用锰法,但对于受污染的地表水用铬法更适合。

关 键 词:铬法  锰法  地表水  COD值  氧化率
文章编号:1008-0171(2003)04-0053-03
修稿时间:2003年9月14日

A study of Cr method and Mn method for monitoring the COD in Earth's surface water
GUAN Gong-cou,LIAO Li-ping,HUANG Yao-wei.A study of Cr method and Mn method for monitoring the COD in Earth''''s surface water[J].Journal of Foshan University(Natural Science Edition),2003,21(4):53-55.
Authors:GUAN Gong-cou  LIAO Li-ping  HUANG Yao-wei
Abstract:Through adopting Cr method and Mn method to monitor the COD in campus lake water in Foshan University and comparing each other in the condition of analysis and in the rate of oxidation,the result indicates:the accuracy of Cr method is higher than Mn method,the oxidation of Cr method is more complete than Mn method,therefore,adoption of Cr method in the control of organism pollutant synthesizing index is more suitable than using Mn method.In monitoring the COD in the clean Earth's surface water,we can use Mn method,but for the contaminative Earth's surface water,Cr method is more suitable.
Keywords:Cr method  Mn method  Earth's surface water  COD value  the rate of oxidation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号